Reference Peril Vocabulary: Design Specification

Version 0.2, draft for review. Specifies the reference peril vocabulary of LATTICE’s applied insurance reference implementation, and how Open CBAA uses it as one of the peril schemes an agreement may bind. Open CBAA authors no peril scheme: the contract’s drafter or the market supplies it, and the MORK bridge connects what they supply to this reference. The companion whitepaper argues why the vocabulary has the shape it has, and the asset exposure ontology is its main consumer outside the contract.

Citations of design-spec and of codes AP, DP, D and I refer to Open CBAA’s design specification and LATTICE integration specification. Where this sketch and the applied insurance reference epic or its ADRs (A-98 to A-102) differ, they take precedence.


1. Purpose and Position

A peril, in this vocabulary, describes a event or condition that could result in an adverse outcome: an earthquake, burst pipe, riot, ransomware attack, insolvency, etc. Market usage stretches the word much further, to consequences (business interruption), the thing harmed (cargo), legal bases (product liability), and to lines of business (such as “automotive”).

The reference vocabulary keeps the word to its core sense and gives each of those other axes its own scheme, so each can be matched, excluded and crosswalked on its own terms (whitepaper §4).

Question Answer
Who owns it LATTICE, in its applied insurance reference implementation (applied/insurance/peril, §4). It is a reference, not a market standard, and says so on every scheme
Who supplies CBAA perils the drafter of each agreement (an MGA, carrier or broker) or the market, possibly including a view the LMA may publish, which is welcome. Their scheme is the operative one for the wording (MORK bridge, B1)
When it applies as the unscoped fallback, when nothing more specific is bound. An agreement’s own list, a drafting organisation’s list and a market edition all take precedence (MORK bridge §2)
How other schemes are handled flat lists and simple taxonomies are first-class. Checks run at the level of structure the operative scheme has, and reach this reference’s richer structure only through reviewed crosswalks (MORK bridge §3, §4)
Who consumes it rsk:peril and the statement scope parameters in Open CBAA, the exposure ontology’s peril metrics and loss records, and the applied insurance binding-contract module’s peril scope
What it is built on LATTICE Vocabulary: every scheme is a voc:ConceptScheme edition, every consuming property names a voc:SchemeContract. SKOS for concepts, with a small, SKOS-compatible extension (§6)
What it is not a statement of what any contract covers. Whether a storm surge counts as windstorm or flood, or which cause governs a mixed loss, is contract meaning and lives in statements (§8)

1.1 What the CBAA drafts ask of it

The module drafts and their base tables define the requirements the vocabulary must serve.

Draft Use of perils Consequence here
M5 SoUA base table, rows “Included Perils” and “Excluded Perils” optional per segment (column). The guidance says the rows are not a full list, only the key perils that drive different sums insured or GWP limits, or single-peril cover hierarchical include and exclude sets, one pair per segment. Perils are a segmentation driver, so a scope can name a peril at any level (§7.2)
M5 SoUA “Perils List” tab the value list for those rows: a flat list of 525 codes whose own heading reads “cause of loss, subclass of business”. It mixes natural causes, human acts, defects, consequences (delay, shortage), legal bases, injuries, product-specific torts and “no details” no hierarchy and no axes. Crosswalked by decomposition into cause and characteristic values (§9.2), never adopted as the cause scheme
M5 SoUA row “Standard Exclusions” war and war-related perils including civil war, nuclear, chemical, biological or radioactive perils, and financial guarantee, default, bankruptcy or insolvency risks. Standard on every segment, and removing one marks the table non-standard a standard set spanning three families, one of which is not a cause at all (§7.3)
M5 SoUA rows “Cyber Coverage Exclusion” and “Specific Inclusions” “losses caused by a Cyber event”, excluded or included per segment. “Cyber event” is a defined term of the wording cyber’s definition basis is wording-defined (§5.6)
M5 SoUA row “Applicable Pool Scheme(s)” per segment, from a list of national terrorism and flood pools pools as their own scheme linked to perils and territory (§9.4)
M5 insurable interest descriptors and segment names “direct physical loss or damage including the lesser perils of fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief”, “excluding flood and earthquake”, “Property - Exc Wind, Flood” open perils with exclusions, and named bundles (§7)
M5 clause 5.15.1 where property is in France and cover includes fire or other damage, the Coverholder must offer natural catastrophe cover under French regulation an obligation conditioned on peril and territory. Needs the natural hazard family as a matchable set (§7.3)
M5 base tables, sum insured basis list “any one catastrophe”, “any one event”, “each and every loss or series” occurrence grouping depends on the peril (§6.4, event window)
M6 remuneration, option D commission levels may differ across risks, locations, perils or segments peril as a dimension of a remuneration schedule
M3 amendments a natural catastrophe event or cyber attack as a reason electronic means cannot be used peril terms appear in operational conditions, not only in scope

2. Principles

# Principle
PV1 One axis per scheme. The cause backbone classifies by initiating event. Mechanism, agency, onset, definition basis, accumulation character, consequence and harm subject are separate schemes, so no concept needs two parents to say two different things
PV2 Event-family placement. A secondary effect sits under the event family that initiates it (fire following earthquake under earthquake), because cat models, event definitions and aggregation all group that way. Cross-family triggering is a typed relation, never a second skos:broader
PV3 Kinds and parts are different broader links. A hurricane is a kind of tropical cyclone. A storm surge is part of a tropical cyclone event. Both are skos:broader to SKOS consumers, and the vocabulary also records which one it is (§6.1)
PV4 Bundles are collections, not nodes. “Fire and extended perils”, “wind with surge” and the CBAA standard exclusions are skos:Collections whose members span families. They never appear in the hierarchy
PV5 “All perils” is not a concept. An open-perils grant is a hierarchical condition requiring every top concept of the bound edition, with exclusions (§7.2). A single top concept called “all perils” would sit in every market edition’s hierarchy as a node no wording ever means, and a wildcard would also admit values from outside the scheme
PV6 Definition basis is explicit. A named storm exists because an authority named it. A hurricane exists above a wind threshold in given basins. A cyber event is whatever the wording defines. The basis is recorded, and threshold definitions point at Quantification (§6.4)
PV7 Market framing through editions and labels. Regional names (hurricane, typhoon, bushfire) are labels or narrower concepts by stated rule. Market-specific bundles, definitions and codes come from scoped market editions and crosswalks, never from forks of the reference
PV8 Contract meaning stays in contracts. The vocabulary may record what is customary (a typical event window, typical mechanisms) as informative data. It never decides coverage
PV9 SKOS-compatible extension only. Every addition is a sub-property of a SKOS property or a plain property on skos:Concept. A SKOS-only consumer loses detail but never meaning

3. Architecture

One release contains several schemes, each a separate voc:ConceptScheme edition with its own identity, so each can be versioned and bound on its own.

flowchart TB
    subgraph Release["Reference peril vocabulary release"]
        C["Cause scheme (backbone)<br/>~240 concepts, 8 families"]
        M["Mechanism scheme"]
        A["Agency scheme"]
        O["Onset scheme"]
        D["Definition basis scheme"]
        K["Accumulation class scheme"]
        Q["Consequence scheme"]
        H["Harm subject scheme"]
        I["Intensity measure scheme"]
        B["Collections<br/>bundles, model groups, standard sets"]
    end
    C -- "prl:typicalMechanism" --> M
    C -- "prl:typicalAgency" --> A
    C -- "prl:onset" --> O
    C -- "prl:definitionBasis" --> D
    C -- "prl:accumulationClass" --> K
    C -- "prl:intensityMeasure" --> I
    C -- "prl:typicalConsequence" --> Q
    B -- "skos:member" --> C
    I -- "prl:measuredOn" --> V["qnt:ValueSpace"]
    X["Crosswalks<br/>open cat codes, market cause-of-loss lists"] -- "skos:*Match / MORK" --> C
Scheme Contents Consumed by
Cause the peril backbone (§5) rsk:peril, statement scopes, exposure peril metrics, loss records, contract peril scope
Mechanism how harm is inflicted: shaking, inundation, wind load, fire, impact, contamination, electrical overstress, data encryption contract write-back scopes (cyber physical damage), classification rules, exposure loss records
Agency natural, accidental, negligent, malicious criminal, malicious political, sovereign, belligerent, undetermined cyber malicious or non-malicious splits, terrorism against vandalism, war exclusions
Onset sudden, gradual, latent, recurrent pollution and long-tail distinctions, deterioration exclusions
Definition basis physical, designation, threshold, wording-defined, statutory, index named storm, hurricane, cyber event, flood under a national scheme, parametric triggers
Accumulation class catastrophe, systemic, attritional aggregates, capacity, portfolio questions
Consequence heads of loss: direct physical damage, business interruption, extra expense, recall, clean-up, liability to others, defence costs coverage types and the market’s habit of calling these perils (whitepaper §3.1)
Harm subject property, persons, financial interest, data and systems, environment, reputation what was harmed. Liability direction is derived from party roles, not from this scheme (term parameters §7)
Intensity measure PGA, spectral acceleration, 3-second gust, sustained wind, flood depth, flow velocity, surge height, hail diameter, fireline intensity, ash load, snow load threshold definitions, parametric triggers, exposure hazard attributes

4. Namespaces, Files and Versions

An insurance sub-domain module of LATTICE’s applied layer, applied/insurance/peril/, beside common/, exposure/ and the others (asset exposure ontology §3). It has its own release cycle for editions and crosswalks. Its scheme contract is in insurance/common/, so modules that only classify by peril need not import the vocabulary. Applied content is not substrate, so LATTICE’s clean-room rule does not govern its naming. Open CBAA resolves it through its catalog by release tag, as it does LATTICE’s layers.

File (under lattice/ontology/applied/insurance/peril/) Content Version IRI
spec/peril.ttl the prl: properties of §6, and nothing else …/insurance/peril/0.1.0
vocab/peril-vocab.ttl the cause scheme and the characteristic and companion schemes, as reference editions …/insurance/peril-vocab/0.1.0
vocab/peril-intensity.ttl the intensity measure scheme and its qnt:ValueSpaces …/insurance/peril-intensity/0.1.0
vocab/peril-collections.ttl reference collections (§7) …/insurance/peril-collections/0.1.0
crosswalk/*.ttl one reviewed crosswalk per external code system (§9), each the artefact of a MORK mapping graph per file
shapes/ vocabulary well-formedness (§10), versioned by .version  

… is https://www.nebularis.org/neuro-semantic. Namespace https://www.nebularis.org/neuro-semantic/insurance/peril#, prefix prl:, for properties and datatypes. Schemes and concepts live in the vocabulary’s own namespace, https://www.nebularis.org/neuro-semantic/insurance/peril/vocab#, prefix prl-voc: (ADR-A98 decision 6). Examples in this sketch write concepts as prl:: read them as prl-voc:. Each scheme carries skos:editorialNote stating it is a reference edition, and fnd:hasGovernanceState Active.

Every concept carries:

5. The Cause Scheme

Eight top concepts. Codes are family.group.concept. K marks a kind (prl:broaderGeneric), P a part of an event (prl:broaderPartitive), per §6.1. Unmarked children are kinds. The last column gives the open cat-model code where one exists, and notes.

5.1 N — Natural hazard

Code Concept Link Model code, notes
N Natural hazard top  
N.GEO Geophysical hazard K  
N.GEO.EQ Earthquake K event family. Collection prl:AllEarthquake adds tsunami
N.GEO.EQ.SHK Ground shaking P QEQ. Mechanism: shaking
N.GEO.EQ.FFE Fire following earthquake P QFF. Mechanism: fire. Canonical example of PV2
N.GEO.EQ.LIQ Liquefaction P QLF. Mechanism: ground failure
N.GEO.EQ.LSD Earthquake-induced landslide P QLS. prl:overlaps N.GEO.MM.LS
N.GEO.EQ.SPL Sprinkler leakage following earthquake P related T.EOW.SPR
N.GEO.EQ.AFT Aftershock K a later earthquake. Whether it is the same occurrence is an event-definition question for the contract
N.GEO.TSU Tsunami K own family, triggered by several initiators
N.GEO.TSU.EQT Earthquake-induced tsunami K QTS. prl:canTrigger from N.GEO.EQ
N.GEO.TSU.LST Landslide or volcanic tsunami K prl:canTrigger from N.GEO.MM, N.GEO.VOL
N.GEO.VOL Volcanic activity K  
N.GEO.VOL.ASH Volcanic ashfall P mechanism: burial and load, contamination. Aviation-relevant
N.GEO.VOL.LAV Lava flow P  
N.GEO.VOL.PYR Pyroclastic flow P  
N.GEO.VOL.LAH Lahar P prl:overlaps N.GEO.MM.LS.DF
N.GEO.VOL.GAS Volcanic gas release P  
N.GEO.MM Mass movement K alt label “earth movement”
N.GEO.MM.LS Landslide K  
N.GEO.MM.LS.RF Rockfall and rockslide K  
N.GEO.MM.LS.DF Debris flow K  
N.GEO.MM.LS.MF Mudflow and mudslide K some national flood schemes define mudflow as flood. Handled by crosswalk, not polyhierarchy
N.GEO.MM.SUB Subsidence K natural subsidence. Induced subsidence is T.STR.FND with agency negligent
N.GEO.MM.SNK Sinkhole collapse K  
N.GEO.MM.HVE Ground heave K  
N.GEO.MM.AVL Snow avalanche K prl:canTrigger from N.MET.WIN
N.MET Meteorological hazard K  
N.MET.TC Tropical cyclone K event family. WTC for wind
N.MET.TC.WND Tropical cyclone wind P WTC
N.MET.TC.SRG Tropical cyclone storm surge P WSS. prl:overlaps N.HYD.FLD.CST. Mechanism: inundation. Whitepaper §3.5
N.MET.TC.RFL Tropical cyclone rainfall flooding P mechanism: inundation. prl:overlaps N.HYD.FLD
N.MET.TC.TOR Tropical cyclone tornado P prl:overlaps N.MET.SCS.TOR
N.MET.TC.HUR Hurricane K definition basis threshold: sustained wind at hurricane strength in the North Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins
N.MET.TC.TYP Typhoon K threshold, western North Pacific basin
N.MET.TC.SEV Severe tropical cyclone K threshold, South Pacific and Indian Ocean basins. Alt label “cyclone”
N.MET.TC.TST Tropical storm K below hurricane strength
N.MET.NS Named storm K definition basis designation: a storm named by a recognised meteorological authority. prl:overlaps N.MET.TC and N.MET.ETC. Not a kind of either (whitepaper §3.4)
N.MET.ETC Extratropical cyclone K WEC. Alt labels “windstorm”, “European windstorm”
N.MET.ETC.WND Extratropical cyclone wind P WEC
N.MET.ETC.SRG Extratropical storm surge P mechanism: inundation. prl:overlaps N.HYD.FLD.CST
N.MET.SCS Severe convective storm K event family
N.MET.SCS.TOR Tornado P XTD
N.MET.SCS.HAI Hail P XHL
N.MET.SCS.SLW Straight-line wind P XSL
N.MET.SCS.SLW.DER Derecho K  
N.MET.SCS.LTG Lightning P mechanism: electrical overstress, fire. Also occurs without a severe storm, which the definition allows
N.MET.SCS.HVR Convective heavy rainfall P prl:canTrigger N.HYD.FLD.PLU, N.HYD.FLD.FSH
N.MET.WIN Winter storm and cold K  
N.MET.WIN.SNL Snow load P  
N.MET.WIN.ICE Ice storm and freezing rain P  
N.MET.WIN.BLZ Blizzard K  
N.MET.WIN.FRZ Freeze K prl:canTrigger T.EOW.PIP
N.MET.WIN.FRS Frost K agricultural
N.MET.LWS Local and other windstorm K non-cyclonic wind. Alt label “tempest”. Some wordings define storm by a wind-speed threshold, which a market edition expresses with definition basis threshold
N.MET.DST Sand and dust storm K  
N.HYD Hydrological hazard K  
N.HYD.FLD Flood K inland and coastal flooding not attributed to a cyclone event. OO1 via collection
N.HYD.FLD.FLU Fluvial flood K ORF
N.HYD.FLD.PLU Pluvial and surface-water flood K OPF
N.HYD.FLD.FSH Flash flood K  
N.HYD.FLD.GWF Groundwater flood K  
N.HYD.FLD.CST Coastal flood K OSF. High water and wave overtopping. Cyclone surge is under its cyclone and overlaps here
N.HYD.FLD.ICJ Ice-jam flood K  
N.HYD.FLD.GLF Glacial lake outburst flood K  
N.HYD.ERS Erosion K  
N.HYD.ERS.CST Coastal erosion K  
N.HYD.ERS.FLD Flood-related erosion K  
N.HYD.WAV Wave action K related “perils of the seas” (§9.3)
N.CLI Climatological hazard K  
N.CLI.DRT Drought K onset gradual
N.CLI.HTW Extreme heat K alt label “heatwave”
N.CLI.CLD Extreme cold K alt label “cold wave”
N.CLI.WF Wildfire K BBF. Agency undetermined: ignition may be lightning, accident or arson. Alt label “bushfire” (regional)
N.CLI.WF.FOR Forest fire K  
N.CLI.WF.GRS Grass and brush fire K BSK
N.BIO Biological hazard K  
N.BIO.OUT Infectious disease outbreak K  
N.BIO.OUT.EPI Epidemic K  
N.BIO.OUT.PAN Pandemic K accumulation class systemic
N.BIO.INF Infestation K pests, vermin, invasive species. Onset gradual
N.BIO.CRD Crop disease K  
N.BIO.ANI Animal disease K livestock, bloodstock, aquaculture
N.BIO.MLD Mould and fungal growth K onset gradual. Commonly excluded
N.BIO.ALG Harmful algal bloom K  
N.EXT Extraterrestrial hazard K  
N.EXT.GMS Geomagnetic storm K accumulation class systemic. prl:canTrigger T.UTL.PWR
N.EXT.SRS Solar radiation storm K alt label “solar flare”
N.EXT.MET Meteoroid impact K  

5.2 T — Technological and accidental

Code Concept Link Notes
T Technological and accidental event top agency accidental unless a characteristic value says otherwise
T.FIR Fire K accidental fire not initiated by a natural hazard
T.FIR.ELF Electrical fire K related T.EQB.ELC
T.FIR.SCB Spontaneous combustion K  
T.FIR.HWK Hot work fire K  
T.EXP Explosion K mechanism: blast and overpressure
T.EXP.PVE Boiler and pressure vessel explosion K related T.EQB.PVF
T.EXP.GAS Gas explosion K related T.REL.GLK
T.EXP.DST Dust explosion K  
T.EXP.CHM Chemical explosion K  
T.EXP.VCE Vapour cloud explosion K  
T.EXP.EXS Accidental detonation of explosives K  
T.EQB Equipment breakdown K the peril. The coverage section of the same name is a consequence and coverage matter, and the equipment is an asset class (whitepaper §3.7)
T.EQB.MEC Mechanical breakdown K  
T.EQB.MEC.TRB Turbine failure K  
T.EQB.ELC Electrical breakdown K  
T.EQB.ELC.SCT Short circuit K  
T.EQB.ELC.OVV Overvoltage and power surge K prl:canTrigger from N.MET.SCS.LTG
T.EQB.ELC.ARC Arc flash K  
T.EQB.ELC.TRF Transformer failure K  
T.EQB.PVF Pressure vessel failure K  
T.EQB.TCF Refrigeration and temperature-control failure K prl:typicalConsequence spoilage
T.EQB.CTL Control system malfunction K non-cyber. prl:overlaps C.NML.OTF
T.STR Structural failure K  
T.STR.COL Collapse K  
T.STR.FAC Facade and cladding failure K  
T.STR.FND Foundation failure K  
T.STR.DAM Dam and levee failure K prl:canTrigger N.HYD.FLD
T.EOW Escape of water and other liquids K alt label “water damage”. Distinct from flood by definition
T.EOW.PIP Pipe burst K  
T.EOW.SPR Sprinkler leakage K  
T.EOW.SWR Sewer and drain backup K  
T.EOW.TNK Tank rupture and leakage K  
T.UTL Utility service failure K loss of supply from outside the premises
T.UTL.PWR Power supply failure K  
T.UTL.GAS Gas supply failure K  
T.UTL.WAT Water supply failure K  
T.UTL.TEL Telecommunications failure K prl:overlaps C.NML.SVC
T.REL Release of hazardous substances K alt label “pollution”
T.REL.CHM Chemical release K  
T.REL.OIL Oil spill K  
T.REL.GLK Gas leak K  
T.REL.RAD Accidental radiological release K related P.TER.CBR.RAD for the deliberate kind
T.REL.ASB Asbestos release K onset latent
T.REL.BIO Accidental biological agent release K  
T.NUC Nuclear installation incident K commonly excluded or pooled
T.TRN Transport accident K  
T.TRN.RD Road collision K  
T.TRN.OVT Overturn K  
T.TRN.MAR Marine casualty K  
T.TRN.MAR.COL Collision at sea K  
T.TRN.MAR.GRD Grounding and stranding K  
T.TRN.MAR.SNK Sinking, capsizing and foundering K  
T.TRN.AIR Aviation accident K  
T.TRN.AIR.CRS Aircraft crash K  
T.TRN.AIR.GND Ground collision K  
T.TRN.AIR.BRD Bird strike K  
T.TRN.AIR.FOD Foreign object ingestion K  
T.TRN.RAI Rail accident K  
T.TRN.RAI.DER Derailment K  
T.TRN.RAI.COL Rail collision K  
T.TRN.SPC Space activity accident K  
T.TRN.SPC.LCH Launch failure K  
T.TRN.SPC.ORB In-orbit failure K  
T.TRN.SPC.DEB Space debris collision K  
T.TRN.SPC.REE Re-entry failure K  
T.IMP Impact K impact on property not caused by a transport accident of the insured
T.IMP.VEH Vehicle impact K  
T.IMP.ACR Aircraft and articles dropped from aircraft K  
T.IMP.FOB Falling objects K  
T.HND Handling and loading damage K  

5.3 E — Error, defect and deterioration

Code Concept Link Notes
E Error, defect and deterioration top agency negligent or accidental. Separated from T because most wordings treat defect and deterioration as exclusions with ensuing-loss write-backs
E.DES Design defect K  
E.WRK Defective workmanship K  
E.MAT Faulty materials K  
E.LAT Latent defect K onset latent
E.TST Testing and commissioning failure K  
E.PRD Product defect K manufacturing defect, contamination, mislabelling
E.HUM Human error K  
E.HUM.OPR Operator error K  
E.HUM.MNT Maintenance failure K  
E.PRO Professional error and omission K negligent advice, calculation, administration or service
E.DET Deterioration K onset gradual
E.DET.WNT Wear and tear K  
E.DET.COR Corrosion K  
E.DET.INV Inherent vice K  

5.4 H — Deliberate human acts

Code Concept Link Notes
H Deliberate human act top agency malicious criminal unless stated
H.THF Theft K mechanism: deprivation
H.THF.BUR Burglary K  
H.THF.ROB Robbery K  
H.THF.EMP Employee theft K  
H.THF.TRS Theft in transit K kept because transit custody changes underwriting, not only context
H.FRD Fraud and dishonesty K  
H.FRD.FOR Forgery K  
H.FRD.SOC Social engineering fraud K prl:overlaps C.MAL.SEN
H.FRD.CMP Computer fraud K prl:overlaps C.MAL
H.FRD.EMD Employee dishonesty K  
H.FRD.CFT Counterfeiting K  
H.EXT Extortion K  
H.EXT.KID Kidnap for ransom K  
H.EXT.THR Extortion threat K non-cyber
H.EXT.HJK Hijack and detention K  
H.MAL Malicious damage K  
H.MAL.VAN Vandalism K  
H.MAL.ARS Arson K mechanism: fire
H.MAL.TMP Malicious product tampering K  
H.VIO Violence against persons K  
H.VIO.ASL Assault and battery K  
H.VIO.ABS Abuse and molestation K onset latent in claims
H.WRA Wrongful act K conduct giving rise to liability. The liability basis is a coverage axis, not a peril (whitepaper §4)
H.WRA.EMP Employment practices wrongful act K  
H.WRA.EMP.DIS Discrimination K  
H.WRA.EMP.HAR Harassment K  
H.WRA.EMP.DSM Wrongful dismissal K  
H.WRA.EMP.RET Retaliation K  
H.WRA.EMP.WHV Wage and hour violation K  
H.WRA.MGT Management breach of duty K  
H.WRA.FID Fiduciary breach K  
H.WRA.IPI Intellectual property infringement K  
H.WRA.DEF Defamation K  
H.WRA.PRV Privacy violation K prl:overlaps C.MAL.EXF
H.WRA.MIS Misrepresentation and mis-selling K  
H.WRA.ANT Anticompetitive conduct K  

5.5 P — Conflict and political

Code Concept Link Notes
P Conflict and political event top  
P.WAR War and hostile acts K agency belligerent. The CBAA standard exclusion (§7.3)
P.WAR.WAR War K declared or not
P.WAR.CVW Civil war K  
P.WAR.INV Invasion K  
P.WAR.HOS Hostile act by a belligerent K  
P.WAR.WPN Weapons of war K derelict mines, torpedoes, unexploded ordnance
P.WAR.SZR War seizure and capture K  
P.WAR.CYW State cyber operation K prl:overlaps C.MAL. Agency sovereign or belligerent
P.TER Terrorism K agency malicious political. Pools apply by territory (§9.4)
P.TER.CNV Conventional terrorism K  
P.TER.CBR CBRN terrorism K  
P.TER.CBR.CHM Chemical attack K  
P.TER.CBR.BIO Biological attack K  
P.TER.CBR.RAD Radiological attack K  
P.TER.CBR.NUC Nuclear attack K  
P.TER.CYT Cyber terrorism K prl:overlaps C.MAL
P.PV Political violence K  
P.PV.RIO Riot K  
P.PV.CCM Civil commotion K  
P.PV.STK Strike and labour disturbance K includes lockout
P.PV.INS Insurrection K  
P.PV.RBL Rebellion and revolution K  
P.PV.CPD Coup d’état K  
P.PV.SAB Political sabotage K related H.MAL
P.GOV Government and sovereign action K agency sovereign
P.GOV.EXP Expropriation K  
P.GOV.CNF Confiscation K  
P.GOV.NAT Nationalisation K  
P.GOV.DEP Creeping deprivation K  
P.GOV.CIV Currency inconvertibility K  
P.GOV.TRR Transfer restriction K  
P.GOV.EMB Embargo and sanctions K  
P.GOV.LIC Licence cancellation K  
P.GOV.CFR Contract frustration by a sovereign K  
P.GOV.ACA Acts of authorities K closure orders, detainment, requisition. prl:typicalConsequence denial of access

5.6 C — Cyber

The first split is by agency, because every market wording that treats cyber splits there (malicious act, or non-malicious event with a write-back). The agency characteristic is still asserted on each concept, so both views agree.

Code Concept Link Notes
C Cyber event top definition basis wording-defined: the reference definition is informative, and a bound wording’s defined term governs
C.MAL Malicious cyber act K agency malicious criminal, political or sovereign
C.MAL.INT Unauthorised access and intrusion K  
C.MAL.RAN Ransomware K mechanism: data encryption. prl:typicalConsequence extortion payment, data restoration
C.MAL.MWR Other malware K  
C.MAL.DOS Denial of service attack K  
C.MAL.EXF Data exfiltration K  
C.MAL.SEN Social engineering attack K alt label “phishing”
C.MAL.EXT Cyber extortion K  
C.MAL.SUP Supply chain compromise K accumulation class systemic
C.MAL.OTA Operational technology attack K prl:canTrigger T.FIR, T.EXP, T.EQB
C.NML Non-malicious cyber event K agency accidental or negligent
C.NML.SWF Software failure K  
C.NML.CFG Configuration and operator error K related E.HUM
C.NML.SVC Third-party IT service outage K accumulation class systemic
C.NML.OTF Operational technology failure K prl:canTrigger T.FIR, T.EXP, T.EQB
C.NML.DLS Accidental data loss or disclosure K  

5.7 F — Financial and counterparty

Code Concept Link Notes
F Financial and counterparty event top  
F.DEF Default K  
F.DEF.NPY Non-payment K buyer or borrower
F.DEF.SOV Sovereign default K agency sovereign
F.DEF.PNP Principal non-performance K the surety trigger
F.INS Insolvency K  
F.CFR Contract frustration K non-sovereign counterparty
F.MKT Adverse market movement K  
F.MKT.RVS Residual value shortfall K  
F.MKT.MVD Market value decline K  

“Financial guarantee” is not a cause. The CBAA standard exclusion that names it reads as a class of business and an insurable interest, and the reference collection for that exclusion (§7.3) says so (whitepaper §3.2).

5.8 L — Life and health

Code Concept Link Notes
L Life and health event top harm subject persons
L.MOR Death K alt label “mortality”
L.MRB Illness and disability K alt label “morbidity”
L.MRB.CRI Critical illness diagnosis K definition basis wording-defined
L.MRB.DIS Disability K  
L.MRB.LTC Need for long-term care K  
L.LNG Longevity K accumulation class systemic
L.ACC Accident to a person K  
L.ACC.OCC Occupational accident K  
L.OCD Occupational disease K onset latent
L.MED Medical treatment injury K related E.PRO

6. Structure Beyond SKOS

SKOS gives broader, narrower, related, collections and mapping properties. The vocabulary needs six more things, each added in a form SKOS consumers can ignore safely (PV9).

6.1 Kinds and parts: generic and partitive broader

prl:broaderGeneric    rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:broader .   # a kind of
prl:broaderPartitive  rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:broader .   # a part of the parent event

Aligned with the international thesaurus standard’s RDF vocabulary (iso-thes:broaderGeneric, iso-thes:broaderPartitive) by owl:equivalentProperty, so thesaurus tooling reads them. Each concept states exactly one of them to its primary parent, and skos:broader is materialised so SKOS consumers and LATTICE’s HierarchicalMatch (which walks skos:broader+) see the plain hierarchy.

The distinction matters in three places. A hurricane deductible applies to kinds of tropical cyclone, not to its parts. “All tropical cyclone perils” for a model means every part. A generated design-time class (Surface) may need either reading. Matching on generic links only needs an Eligibility option LATTICE lacks (whitepaper §7, L-P2).

6.2 Typed associative relations

prl:canTrigger  a owl:ObjectProperty , owl:IrreflexiveProperty ;
    rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:semanticRelation .       # directed: initiating → secondary
prl:overlaps    a owl:ObjectProperty , owl:SymmetricProperty , owl:IrreflexiveProperty ;
    rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:related .                # symmetric: extensions intersect

prl:canTrigger records cross-family causation (tropical cyclone to inland flood, cyber to fire, freeze to pipe burst). It is directed, and SKOS has no directed associative property: its only associative relation, skos:related, is symmetric, so a sub-property of it would entail the association in both directions. prl:canTrigger is therefore a sub-property of skos:semanticRelation, which SKOS provides as the super-property for relations of meaning between concepts. It is neither symmetric nor transitive: chains of triggering are facts about occurrences (§6.7). In the §5 tables, “prl:canTrigger from X” means X prl:canTrigger the row’s concept. SKOS makes only skos:related disjoint with skos:broaderTransitive (S27), so the SKOS integrity shape (§10) states the same rule for prl:canTrigger explicitly: it never links an event to its own parts (PV2 puts those under broader).

prl:overlaps is declared symmetric itself, because a sub-property does not inherit its super-property’s symmetry.

It records that two concepts’ extensions intersect without either being a kind of the other: named storm and tropical cyclone, cyclone surge and coastal flood, social engineering fraud and social engineering attack. It is the signal that a wording may classify an occurrence under either, and every overlap is a candidate for a classification statement (§8).

6.3 Characteristic properties

Plain object properties with domain skos:Concept, each constrained by a scheme contract to its characteristic scheme:

Property Cardinality on cause concepts Characteristic scheme
prl:typicalAgency 1..* agency
prl:onset 1..1 onset
prl:definitionBasis 1..1 definition basis
prl:typicalMechanism 0..* mechanism
prl:accumulationClass 0..1 accumulation class
prl:typicalConsequence 0..* consequence
prl:harmSubject 0..* harm subject

“Typical” marks a default. An occurrence’s actual agency or mechanism is a fact about the occurrence (a loss record, a claim), recorded there with the same characteristic schemes.

prl:intensityMeasure  a owl:ObjectProperty ;   # cause concept → intensity measure concept
    rdfs:domain skos:Concept .
prl:measuredOn        a owl:ObjectProperty ;   # intensity measure concept → qnt:ValueSpace
    rdfs:range qnt:ValueSpace .
prl:definingThreshold a owl:ObjectProperty ;   # threshold-defined concept → qnt:RangeSet
    rdfs:range qnt:RangeSet .
prl:customaryEventWindow a owl:ObjectProperty ; # informative: qnt:Quantity on a duration space
    rdfs:range qnt:Quantity .

Each intensity measure has a qnt:ValueSpace with a unit contract (acceleration in g or m/s², wind speed in m/s, kn or mph, depth in m). A threshold-defined concept (hurricane, a wording’s “storm”) points at the range set that defines it, on the measure’s space, with the averaging period stated by the measure (1-minute sustained against 10-minute mean are different measures, not different units). Parametric triggers reuse the same spaces.

prl:customaryEventWindow records the window a peril’s occurrences are customarily grouped by (72 hours for wind, 168 hours for earthquake and flood are common). It is informative only (PV8). The window that applies is a contract term.

prl:relevantAttribute   a owl:ObjectProperty .  # cause concept → exposure attribute type concept
prl:minimumGeoPrecision a owl:ObjectProperty .  # cause concept → geocoding precision concept

prl:relevantAttribute names the exposure attributes that change loss for the peril: roof geometry and opening protection for tropical cyclone wind, soil class and soft storey for shaking, first-floor height and basement for flood. The exposure ontology uses it to derive completeness warnings and data requests. prl:minimumGeoPrecision states the geocoding level below which a peril’s hazard cannot be assessed (building level for flood and wildfire, street level for shaking, postcode level for cyclone wind).

6.6 Market and regional labels

Regional synonyms are skos:altLabels when they denote the same concept (bushfire, tempest). Where a label carries a market’s meaning, the market edition uses SKOS-XL labels with a scope note, or, if the meaning differs, a narrower concept of its own with a crosswalk (§9).

6.7 What was considered and not adopted

Option Why not
OWL classes per peril every edition change would be a T-Box release, against DP1. Surface generates classes where a design-time check needs them
One polyhierarchy carrying every axis the approach the whitepaper’s §3 dissects: a concept with two parents meaning two different things cannot be matched or excluded predictably
Reifying causal chains in the vocabulary chains are facts about occurrences and contract rules about them. The vocabulary supplies the possible links (canTrigger), the data supplies the chain

6.8 Checks across cause and characteristics

Eligibility never reads the vocabulary’s structure beyond skos:broader. A check that accounts for a cause and its characteristics is a profile with one condition per axis, each bound to the same subject (ADR-A91). The London cyber write-back, “a non-malicious cyber event that results in fire or explosion”, evaluates each link of a loss’s cause chain (asset exposure ontology §5.12):

ex:cyber-write-back a elg:AdmissionProfile ;
    elg:compatibilityOperation elg:AllRequired ;
    elg:hasCondition ex:is-cyber , ex:not-malicious , ex:burns .

ex:is-cyber a elg:Condition ;
    elg:matchStrategy elg:HierarchicalMatch ;
    elg:constrainedByContract icm:PerilContract ;
    elg:requiredConcept prl:C .
ex:not-malicious a elg:Condition ;
    elg:matchStrategy elg:SetMembership ;
    elg:constrainedByContract icm:PerilAgencyContract ;
    elg:requiredConcept prl:Accidental , prl:Negligent .
ex:burns a elg:Condition ;
    elg:matchStrategy elg:SetMembership ;
    elg:constrainedByContract icm:PerilMechanismContract ;
    elg:requiredConcept prl:Fire , prl:Explosion .

ex:is-cyber-binding a elg:EvidenceBinding ;
    elg:bindsCondition ex:is-cyber ;
    elg:subjectClass aeo:LossCause ;
    elg:evidenceStep [ a elg:EvidenceStep ; elg:stepIndex 0 ;
                       elg:stepProperty aeo:peril ; elg:stepDirection elg:Forward ] .
ex:burns-binding a elg:EvidenceBinding ;
    elg:bindsCondition ex:burns ;
    elg:subjectClass aeo:LossCause ;
    elg:valueReading elg:SomeValue ;         # a link may record several mechanisms (ADR-A103)
    elg:evidenceStep [ a elg:EvidenceStep ; elg:stepIndex 0 ;
                       elg:stepProperty aeo:mechanism ; elg:stepDirection elg:Forward ] .
# ex:not-malicious binds to aeo:LossCause through aeo:agency the same way.

The other uses of the structure reduce to things Eligibility already does:

Structure How a check uses it
characteristics of the cause concept a two-step path, for example aeo:peril then prl:onset. “Every covered peril is of sudden onset” reads the covered perils then prl:onset with elg:EveryValue
collections expanded into required or excluded concepts when the wording is bound (§7.2)
thresholds an interval condition on an intensity quantity (§6.4)
overlaps a design-time shape asking the wording for a classification (§8), not an evaluation
kind links only substrate item S2

Against a drafter’s list, the same profile degrades without new rules. The list’s codes carry no characteristics, so conditions reading them are Undetermined (exe:MissingCandidate), and hierarchical match over a list without a hierarchy leaves unnamed codes Undetermined (exe:NoHierarchy, ADR-A100). A reviewed crosswalk that maps a code exactly lets it be decided against the reference (MORK bridge §3).

7. Collections

7.1 Kinds

Kind Example Class
Model grouping wind with surge, all flood, all earthquake prl:ModelGrouping ⊑ skos:Collection
Named-peril bundle fire and extended perils, vandalism and malicious mischief, strike riot and civil commotion prl:PerilBundle ⊑ skos:Collection
Standard set CBAA standard exclusions prl:StandardSet ⊑ skos:Collection

Collections are editioned with the vocabulary and immutable once published. A market edition supplies its own bundles (§9.3). Membership includes narrower concepts implicitly: a bundle member means the member and everything below it.

7.2 Using collections and open perils in scopes

Collections are expanded at bind time into required or excluded concepts of an Eligibility condition, so no Eligibility change is needed. An open-perils grant is a hierarchical condition whose required concepts are the top concepts of the edition in force, generated at bind time, with the exclusions as excluded concepts (ADR-A87). elg:Wildcard is not used: it would also admit a value from outside the bound scheme, and “all perils” means all perils of the edition.

# CBAA vacant property segment: "direct physical loss or damage excluding flood and earthquake".
ex:perils a elg:Condition ;
    elg:matchStrategy elg:HierarchicalMatch ;
    elg:compatibilityOperation elg:AllRequired ;
    elg:wildcardSemantics elg:NoWildcard ;
    elg:constrainedByContract rsk:PerilContract ;
    elg:requiredConcept prl:N , prl:T , prl:E , prl:H , prl:P , prl:C , prl:F , prl:L ;
    elg:excludedConcept prl:N.HYD.FLD , prl:N.GEO.EQ , prl:N.MET.TC.SRG , prl:N.MET.TC.RFL .

The last two exclusions show why the choice between reading flood by cause and flood by mechanism has to be made in the wording (§8): the bound statement’s classification decides whether cyclone surge and rainfall flooding are excluded as flood.

7.3 Reference collections

Collection Members Note
prl:AllWind N.MET.TC.WND, N.MET.ETC.WND, N.MET.SCS.TOR, N.MET.SCS.SLW, N.MET.LWS  
prl:WindWithSurge AllWind members, N.MET.TC.SRG, N.MET.ETC.SRG spans two families on the mechanism view
prl:AllFlood N.HYD.FLD, N.MET.TC.SRG, N.MET.TC.RFL, N.MET.ETC.SRG the mechanism view of flood
prl:AllEarthquake N.GEO.EQ, N.GEO.TSU.EQT  
prl:FireAndExtendedPerils T.FIR, N.MET.SCS.LTG, T.EXP, T.IMP.ACR, T.IMP.VEH, N.MET.LWS, N.MET.SCS.HAI, P.PV.RIO, P.PV.CCM illustrative, and the “lesser perils” of the CBAA vacant property descriptor. Smoke damage is a mechanism, not a member. Market editions override
prl:VandalismAndMaliciousMischief H.MAL.VAN, H.MAL.ARS  
prl:StrikeRiotCivilCommotion P.PV.STK, P.PV.RIO, P.PV.CCM  
prl:CBAAStandardExclusions P.WAR, P.TER.CBR, T.NUC, T.REL.RAD, F.DEF, F.INS editorial note: the CBAA’s “financial guarantee” wording is a class of business and is expressed on the insurable interest dimension, not here

8. What the Vocabulary Leaves to Wording

Open CBAA’s statement kinds (design-spec §3.3) carry the contract-relative meaning the vocabulary refuses to fix:

Wording does Statement kind Example
defines a peril term stm:Definition “named windstorm” as a storm named by a stated authority, with a stated event window
classifies an overlap stm:Classification cyclone surge counts as named windstorm, not flood, for this policy
resolves concurrent causes stm:Precedence an anti-concurrent causation clause: the exclusion prevails over any concurrent covered cause
writes back a subset stm:Classification plus a scope non-malicious cyber events causing fire or explosion are covered despite the cyber exclusion

The vocabulary’s prl:overlaps links are the checklist: every overlap a bound scope touches should be resolved by a classification or definition in the wording, and a shape can warn when one is not (§10).

8.1 Agency is not liability direction

The agency characteristic records who or what acted to cause an event. It does not say who was harmed, who is liable, who claims or who is paid. Those are party roles, and liability direction (first party, third party, insured against insured, fourth party) is derived from them (term parameters §7). A D&O wrongful act is a cause (H.WRA.MGT) with an agency, and reaches a programme along whichever direction its roles give it.

9. Market Editions and Crosswalks

9.1 Binding

The reference cause scheme is the unscoped fallback (voc:boundScheme) on the applied insurance peril contract and, in Open CBAA, on rsk:PerilContract. Agreement-scoped, organisation-scoped and market-scoped bindings take precedence (MORK bridge §2). A market edition may be independent of the reference (bridged by crosswalk) or extend it (adding narrower concepts and bundles, with skos:broadMatch and skos:exactMatch into it, design-spec §4.3) and is bound by a voc:SchemeBinding scoped to the market, and where needed to a legal regime:

ex:us-surplus-lines-binding a voc:SchemeBinding ;
    voc:forContract rsk:PerilContract ;
    voc:bindsScheme ex:us-market-peril-edition ;
    voc:bindingScope ex:london-market , ex:us-risk-regime ;
    fnd:hasTemporalScope [ a fnd:TemporalScope ; fnd:validFrom "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime ] .

LATTICE’s precedence rule (a binding whose scopes are a strict superset wins) makes this binding win over a London-only binding for US risks written in London, without any Open CBAA logic.

A drafter’s flat list or simple taxonomy is bound the same way, at agreement or organisation scope. It need not extend the reference. Checks run at the structure it has, and are Undetermined where they need more (§6.8, MORK bridge §3).

9.2 Crosswalk kinds

Crosswalk Mechanism
a code that is one concept skos:exactMatch, skos:closeMatch
a code broader or narrower than any concept skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch
a group code skos:exactMatch to a collection is not SKOS-valid, so a group code maps to a prl:ModelGrouping with the code as skos:notation
a flat code that mixes axes a MORK mapping to a tuple of concepts across schemes (cause, mechanism, agency, consequence, harm subject). SKOS mapping properties cannot express a one-to-tuple mapping (whitepaper §3.1)

The CBAA SoUA tables point at a flat market cause-of-loss list of several hundred codes. Its crosswalk is the main MORK mapping graph of this module. Each code decomposes into at most one cause and zero or more characteristic values, and codes with no cause (a legal basis, a consequence, “no details”) map to characteristic values only.

9.3 London and US framings

Topic London framing US framing Consequence for the vocabulary
form of grant open perils with named exclusions and peril sub-limits standard causes-of-loss forms in basic, broad and special variants (named bundles, or open with exclusions) US edition ships the basic and broad bundles as prl:PerilBundles. Special form is a wildcard with an exclusion collection
windstorm meteorological classes from cat models (extratropical cyclone, tropical cyclone) named windstorm by designation, with hurricane deductibles N.MET.NS is designation-based and overlaps both cyclone families. US edition adds its designation authority and event window as definition data
storm surge grouped with wind in model groupings excluded as water outside a named windstorm, covered as named windstorm inside one overlap links plus a classification statement per wording (§8)
flood peril sub-limit sub-limit keyed on a regulatory flood zone, a national scheme primary the zone is an exposure attribute, never a narrower peril (whitepaper §3.6)
cyber market clauses: malicious excluded, non-malicious written back for listed physical mechanisms, or excluded absolutely manuscript or form cyber exclusions agency split in C, mechanism characteristic for write-back scopes
equipment breakdown a section excluded from excess layers a separate form T.EQB is the peril. Section and equipment belong to other axes
marine “perils of the seas” as a term of art inland marine forms London edition adds it as a wording-defined concept with skos:broadMatch to T.TRN.MAR and N.HYD.WAV
pools terrorism and flood pools by territory state residual wind pools, a national flood scheme pools are a separate scheme with prl:coversPeril links, bound by territory (§9.4)

9.4 Risk pools

Pools and residual mechanisms are not perils. A pool scheme (prl:PoolScheme, reference edition empty, deployment editions populated) has concepts with prl:coversPeril (to cause concepts or collections) and prl:poolTerritory (to territory concepts). The CBAA SoUA “applicable pool schemes” row and the exposure ontology’s pool participation both use it.

10. Shapes

Vocabulary well-formedness, run over the reference and each edition that extends it before publication. They are publication rules for structured editions. A drafter’s list bound for use is not required to pass them.

Shape Rule
definition and label every concept has one skos:prefLabel@en and one skos:definition@en
reference code exactly one prl:ReferenceCode notation, unique in the release, matching the code’s position in the hierarchy
primary parent every non-top cause concept has exactly one prl:broaderGeneric or prl:broaderPartitive. Any second skos:broader needs a skos:editorialNote justifying it
materialised broader every prl:broaderGeneric and prl:broaderPartitive also appears as skos:broader
characteristics every cause concept has prl:typicalAgency, prl:onset and prl:definitionBasis
SKOS integrity no skos:related (hence no overlaps) and no canTrigger, in either direction, between concepts in one skos:broaderTransitive chain, and no cycles in skos:broader
threshold definitions a concept with definition basis threshold has prl:definingThreshold, on the space of one of its intensity measures
collections every member is in a scheme of the release or of the edition that declares the collection
crosswalks every mapping target resolves, and no code maps both exactMatch and broadMatch to concepts in one chain
overlap coverage (on data) warning when a bound scope includes one side of a prl:overlaps pair and excludes the other, and the wording has no classification statement for the pair

11. Worked Snippet

prl:N.MET.TC a skos:Concept ;
    skos:inScheme prl:CauseScheme ;
    skos:prefLabel "Tropical cyclone"@en ;
    skos:definition "A rotating, organised storm system originating over tropical or subtropical waters."@en ;
    skos:notation "N.MET.TC"^^prl:ReferenceCode ;
    prl:broaderGeneric prl:N.MET ; skos:broader prl:N.MET ;
    prl:typicalAgency prl:Natural ; prl:onset prl:Sudden ; prl:definitionBasis prl:Physical ;
    prl:accumulationClass prl:Catastrophe ;
    prl:canTrigger prl:N.HYD.FLD.FLU , prl:N.HYD.FLD.PLU ;
    prl:overlaps prl:N.MET.NS ;
    prl:customaryEventWindow [ a qnt:Quantity ; qnt:onSpace stm:DurationSpace ; qnt:numericValue 72.0 ; qnt:inUnit ex:Hour ] .

prl:N.MET.TC.SRG a skos:Concept ;
    skos:prefLabel "Tropical cyclone storm surge"@en ;
    skos:notation "N.MET.TC.SRG"^^prl:ReferenceCode , "WSS"^^prl:CatModelCode ;
    prl:broaderPartitive prl:N.MET.TC ; skos:broader prl:N.MET.TC ;
    prl:typicalMechanism prl:Inundation ;
    prl:overlaps prl:N.HYD.FLD.CST ;
    prl:intensityMeasure prl:SurgeHeight , prl:InundationDepth ;
    prl:relevantAttribute ex:FirstFloorHeight , ex:BasementPresence ;
    prl:minimumGeoPrecision ex:BuildingLevel .

prl:N.MET.TC.HUR a skos:Concept ;
    skos:prefLabel "Hurricane"@en ;
    prl:broaderGeneric prl:N.MET.TC ; skos:broader prl:N.MET.TC ;
    prl:definitionBasis prl:Threshold ;
    prl:definingThreshold ex:hurricane-strength-range .   # on the 1-minute sustained wind space

prl:N.MET.NS a skos:Concept ;
    skos:prefLabel "Named storm"@en ;
    prl:broaderGeneric prl:N.MET ; skos:broader prl:N.MET ;
    prl:definitionBasis prl:Designation ;
    prl:overlaps prl:N.MET.TC , prl:N.MET.ETC .

12. Open Items

# Item Where decided
PV-O1 Ship the cause scheme and characteristics first. Intensity links, pools and the market editions follow whitepaper §8
PV-O2 rsk:peril means “covered peril” on the risk. The exposure ontology’s “exposed to” and the claim’s “caused by” are different properties with the same contract whitepaper §6
PV-O3 Concept deprecation and splitting across editions needs LATTICE concept-level lifecycle (Vocabulary open item) whitepaper §7, L-P1
PV-O4 Matching over generic links only needs an Eligibility traversal option whitepaper §7, L-P2
PV-O5 The crosswalk of the CBAA cause-of-loss list is a MORK mapping graph, whose review is a human task (design-spec §3.7) MORK bridge §4
PV-O6 Publish that crosswalk with the reference edition where the list owner’s terms allow, so every deployment using the list starts aligned ADR-A100 decision 10
PV-O7 Invite the LMA to publish its view, and map it when published MORK bridge §2